Legal Opinion
Paul M. v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 16, 2026No. 5:25-cv-10911Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PAUL M.1, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-10911 v. David R. Grand United States Magistrate Judge2 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. __________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF Nos. 11, 13) Plaintiff Paul M. (“Plaintiff”) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under the Social Security Act…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Charlene M. CUTLIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Ruby E. Heston v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Deborah Colvin v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Bass v. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.