Legal Opinion
Richter v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMichael Catalano, J.
Plaintiffs, Ronald Richter, individually (Ronald) and Kathy, his wife and ward (Kathy) seek an order pursuant to section 610 of the Insurance Law, directing the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) to pay $16,185.70, the ‘ ‘ maximum allowable payment ” to them, with interest from January 29, 1969, being part of a judgment granted to them against defendant, a financially irresponsible motorist, in the amount of $17,685.70.
August 8, 1966, at 12:30 a.m., on Harlem Road, West Seneca, Hew York, plaintiffs were passengers in an automobile owned and operated by defendant,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, DerivativeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
- Eagle Star Ins. Co. v. ParkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Moore v. McDowellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- In re the Arbitration between Michigan Mutual Insurance & MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Fragoso v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2009