Legal Opinion
United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 6, 1983No. 81-1602PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLITZ, Circuit Judge:
Convicted on one count of making a false and fictitious statement in connection with the acquisition of a firearm, contrary to 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(a)(6) and 924(a), 1 Jo Ann Harrelson appeals, contending that: (1) the superseding indictment erroneously included a specific intent element; (2) the trial court erred in declining to instruct the jury on specific intent; and (3) the court erred in refusing to reopen a pretrial • hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress based on an alleged sixth amendment violation. Finding no error, we affirm.
Factual Background
United States…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lesly Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Robert J. L'hoste, R. J. L'Hoste & Company, Inc., Clarence Eugene Rogers and Marvin Cochran, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Clark N. FischelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Robert Bennett SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson, Charles Voyed Harrelson and Elizabeth Nichols ChagraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Ben Lee Basey, Armando Jose Lopez, and Oscar Quirarte Ponce, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- United States v. Scott Richardson, Rafael Bruno Crespo-Diaz, Reinaldo Crespo-Diaz, Benjamin Wayne ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Gregory S. BrebnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.