Legal Opinion

City of Florence v. Fields

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 12, 1936No. 14228Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

The dissenting or minority opinion in this case sets forth the facts, and issues.

In view of the majority opinion in Southern Liquor Distributors et al. v. John M. Daniel, Attorney General, et al. (S. C.), 183 S. E., 765, this day filed, it follows that the petition of the said Edward Fields must be granted.

And it is so adjudged.

Messrs. Justices Carter and Fisi-iburne concur. Mr. Chief Justice Stabrer and Mr. Justice Bonham dissent.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southern Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. DanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936