City of Florence v. Fields
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Baker.
The dissenting or minority opinion in this case sets forth the facts, and issues.
In view of the majority opinion in Southern Liquor Distributors et al. v. John M. Daniel, Attorney General, et al. (S. C.), 183 S. E., 765, this day filed, it follows that the petition of the said Edward Fields must be granted.
And it is so adjudged.
Messrs. Justices Carter and Fisi-iburne concur. Mr. Chief Justice Stabrer and Mr. Justice Bonham dissent.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Southern Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. DanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936