Keigan v. Goode

In response to the plaintiff’s claim that the defendant Goode made and then violated his oral agreement to sell all the outstanding corporate stock of an automobile dealership, Dedham Nissan, Inc., Goode pleaded the Uniform Commercial Code - Investment Securities Statute of Frauds. See G. L. c. 106, § 8-319, as appearing in St. 1983, c. 522, § 5.1 The judge granted summary judg*776ment in favor of Goode, rejecting by implication the plaintiff’s claim that the exception for admissions provided by G. L. c. 106, § 8-319(d), see note 1, supra, applied because Goode admitted in his deposition the…