Legal Opinion

Heatherington v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 15, 1980No. 79-811/T4-493PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COWART, Judge.

We have examined the record and find competent substantial evidence to support appellant’s conviction of delivery of phenobarbital and of conspiracy. State v. Dent, 322 So.2d 543 (Fla.1975); State v. Hubbard, 328 So.2d 465 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

The trial court placed the appellant on probation with a condition that he serve fifty-one weeks in jail without gain time or furlough. Appellant cites Depson v. State, 363 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), as holding that the exclusion of gain time was improper. Apparently Depson involved a straight time term of years, whereas the confinement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DentSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. Depson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. State v. HubbardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Tassel v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. William v. LamarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API