Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Solem

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1986No. 15037PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERTZ, Acting Justice.

This criminal appeal arises from an order dissolving the appellant/petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On July 28, 1981, an information was filed charging the petitioner herein, Everett Alexander, (Alexander), with six counts of Third Degree Forgery. At the same time a Part II Information was filed charging Alexander with being an habitual offender un der SDCL 22-7-7, and which set forth five prior felony convictions.

Thereafter, Alexander entered into a written plea agreement on August 27, 1981, whereby he agreed to plead guilty to both parts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Gregory v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State Ex Rel. Parker v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Jenner v. DooleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lykken v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Petrilli v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Phyle v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API