Legal Opinion

United States v. Ervin L. Jones and Chana D. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1992No. 92-3353 and 92-3354PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants appeal the district court’s orders denying their respective requests for release pending sentencing. 1 The sole issue presented on appeal is whether a district court has the authority to release a defendant pending sentencing or appeal pursuant to the “exceptional reasons” provision of 18. U.S.C. § 3145(c).

Appellants pled guilty to certain drug offenses that carried maximum penalties of forty years. Therefore, appellants were subject to the mandatory detention provisions of the Bail Reform Act. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3142(f)(1)(C), 3143(a)(2), and (b)(2). Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph DisommaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Samantha Carr, Darlene Hunter, and Joseph RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Efren Herrera-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Sipka (Debra Ann) v. Sipka (David Lee)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1991

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose Ramon Garcia, United States of America v. Edward Michael PowersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Bao Deng ChenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  3. United States v. SalomeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. BurnettDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API