Marciano v. Fahs (In Re Marciano)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Dissent
MARKELL, Bankruptcy Judge,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. I believe the majority incorrectly applies or adopts the law on at least two points. Initially, I think it is incorrect and bad policy to adopt a “per se” rule regarding undisputed claims. Next, I believe the majority opinion improperly and incorrectly limits good faith principles with respect to the commencement and conduct of involuntary cases.
Adoption of the “Per Se” Rule as to Disputed Claims
The majority adopts a per se rule that an unstayed state court judgment conclusively determines that there is no bona fide dispute as to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.