Legal Opinion · Dissent

Madison Academy, Inc. v. Hanvey

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 4, 2014No. 2120753Published

1DissentThompson, Presiding Judge

For the reasons discussed below, I believe that substantial evidence supports the trial court’s findings of fact in this case. I also believe that the trial court correctly applied the law to conclude that Lisa Hanvey was entitled to recover workers’ compensation benefits based on a permanent’ and total disability. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

In the context of a workers’ compensation case,

“[o]ur review is restricted to a determination of. whether the trial court’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence. Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-81(e)(2). This statutorily mandated scope of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Ex Parte M & D Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Landers v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  4. Boise Cascade Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Ex Parte StaggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API