Madison Academy, Inc. v. Hanvey
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1DissentThompson, Presiding Judge
For the reasons discussed below, I believe that substantial evidence supports the trial court’s findings of fact in this case. I also believe that the trial court correctly applied the law to conclude that Lisa Hanvey was entitled to recover workers’ compensation benefits based on a permanent’ and total disability. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
In the context of a workers’ compensation case,
“[o]ur review is restricted to a determination of. whether the trial court’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence. Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-81(e)(2). This statutorily mandated scope of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ex Parte LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Ex Parte M & D Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Landers v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- Ex Parte StaggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.