Legal Opinion

People v. Doud

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court abused its discretion by failing *956to grant him an adjournment to permit him to call a defense witness. “Defendant failed to demonstrate that [the] witness[] would provide testimony that was material and favorable to the defense” (People v Tillman, 261 AD2d 854, 855, lv denied 93 NY2d 980; see, People v Benson, 260 AD2d 864, 865, lv denied, 93 NY2d 966). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the court failed to marshall the evidence in an even-handed manner (see, CPL…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. TillmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BAXTER, NATHAN, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. People v. BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API