Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Nelson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 8, 1905No. Gen. No. 12,032Published

Action on the case. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Oscar E. Heard, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is urged in behalf of appellant that the declaration ■does not state a cause of action. As abstracted by appellant the declaration is insufficient, but the abstract is imperfect. The additional abstract furnished by appellee shows that the amended declaration states a cause of action.

The plaintiff was a child one year and nine months old at the time of the accident. So far as the exercise of due care' is concerned, he could not be guilty of contributory negligence. Chicago City Ry. Co. v. Tuoby, 196 Ill. 410. The evidence does…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago City Railway Co. v. TuohyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. IngrahamIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co. v. RiceIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Christian v. IrwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API