Legal Opinion

Hartman Pacific Co. v. Estee

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1923No. 18035PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMain, C. J.

This is an action to recover damages for the alleged breach by the defendants of a contract to accept and pay for 2,000 cases of “Tall Pink” Alaska canned salmon. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment sustaining a recovery by the plaintiff in the sum of $6,521.12, and interest. Prom this judgment, the defendants appeal.

The respondent is a corporation and is engaged in the business of buying and selling salmon. The appellants are copartners engaged in the brokerage business in the city of Seattle under the name of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carver, Frierson & Co. v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  2. Hess v. SeitzickWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Thayer Export Lumber Co. v. NaylorMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  4. J. K. Armsby Co. v. Raymond Bros.-Clarke Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Alden Speare's Sons Co. v. HubingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hartman Pacific Co. v. EsteeWashington Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API