Legal Opinion

Harris v. Broomfield

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 25, 2021No. 4:21-cv-00283Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MAURICE LYDELL HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-00283-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF PARTIAL SERVICE; DISMISSING CERTAIN DEFENANTS 9 v. AND CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE; DISMISSING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS 10 RON BROOMFIELD, et al., WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) has filed a pro se action 14 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is now before the Court for review 15 under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a 16…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API