In Re FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde Products Liability Litigation
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
KURT D. ENGELHARDT, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Defendant United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ FTCA and Contract Claims for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Rec. Doc.196). After hearing oral argument 1 from counsel on July 23, 2008, and after reviewing the Complaint, the memoranda of the parties, and the applicable law, the Court rules as set forth herein.
I. INTRODUCTION
First, the undersigned notes that the motion presently before the Court addresses only the threshold inquiry of whether Plaintiffs’ claims against the government should be…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burgess v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- In Re Fema Trailer Formaldehyde Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
- In re Flint Water Cases; MEEKS et al., v. UNITED STATESDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Salazar v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
- Walters v. FlintDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020