Legal Opinion

Reade v. McKenna

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 16, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The circumstances of the case are fully set out in the opinion filed by the learned vicemhancellor, ubi supra. In our view it is sufficient for an affirmance to say that his finding that the contract had been abandoned by mutual assent of the defendant and the authorized agent of complainant, is fully justified by the evidence. This makes it unnecessary to go into the other phases of the case.

The decree will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Van Bus-kirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ.‘ 12.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paradiso v. MazejySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Marioni v. 94 Broadway, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005