Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Nowakowski
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 23, 2012No. Case No. 1:11-cv-809PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JANET T. NEFF, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in this removed action is a Motion to Remand from Plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) (Dkt. 5). Defendant Diana Nowakowski (Nowakowski) filed a response in opposition (Dkt. 7), and Allstate filed a reply (Dkt. 8). The parties have also since filed supplemental briefing (Dkts. 25, 26 & 28). Having carefully considered the relevant facts and the parties’ thorough arguments, the Court determines, for the reasons discussed herein, that Allstate’s Motion to Remand is properly granted and Allstate’s Complaint for Declaratory…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Merced Irrigation District v. County of MariposaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Fitch v. American Electric Power System Comprehensive Medical PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Lillibridge v. HarveyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023