Legal Opinion

Dorland v. Fidelity Development Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtHotchkiss, J.

The material questions raised by the demurrer will sufficiently appear from a brief statement of the pleadings. The plaintiff, as creditor of the Washington Savings Bank, seeks to enforce, for the benefit of himself and other creditors who may join with him, a mortgage lien alleged to exist in favor of the bank against the Fidelity Development Company and its transferees, and to set aside various conveyances and mortgages of other property of the Fidelity Company as in fraud of creditors. The complaint alleges the taking over of the bank by the superintendent of banks for the purpose of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glenny v. LangdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Skilton v. . CodingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Prentiss v. . BowdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. The Mosler Safe Company v. . Guardian Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Van Tuyl v. SchwabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Motlow v. Southern Holding & Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Bank of United States v. FrostCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API