Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anderson v. Department of Highways

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1966No. Appeal, No. 91Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen:

The new Eminent Domain Code provides:

“(2) A qualified valuation expert may testify on direct or cross-examination in detail as to the valuation of the property . . . which testimony may include but shall not be limited to the following: (i) The price and other terms of any sale or contract to sell the condemned property or comparable property made within a reasonable time before or after the date of condemnation.” Act of June 22, 1964, P. L. 84, §705 (Spec. Sess.), 26 P.S. §1-705.

The new Code changes the law to permit testimony as to value after…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Allegheny County Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Kelly v. Redevelopment Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API