Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 8, 1983No. 83-1072PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The order revoking probation and the judgment of conviction entered thereon are affirmed. Sufficient competent evidence was presented below to satisfy the conscience of the court that the defendant James A. Lee violated the conditions of his probation as found by the trial court in the order revoking probation. See Bernhardt v. State, 288 So.2d 490 (Fla.1974).

In accord with the state’s confession of error, however, it will be necessary to remand the sentencing order under review to the trial court for the purpose of modifying same. The trial court in the said sentencing order gave the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Hurst v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Stefano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co. v. CeballosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Dewberry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API