Legal Opinion

Schinner v. Gundrum

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 2, 2012No. 2011AP564PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

¶ 1. Marshall Schinner appeals a summary judgment dismissing West Bend Insurance Company from his suit against West Bend and its insured, Michael Gundrum. Schinner alleges that he sustained serious injuries after being assaulted by an underage guest at a party Gundrum hosted on family business property. Schinner argues that the circuit court erred in concluding that there was no "occurrence" under the Gundrums' homeowner's insurance policy and, separately, that an exclusion pertaining to non-insured locations bars coverage. We agree with Schinner on both points. We apply case law addressing…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. American Family Mutual Insurance v. American Girl, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Doyle v. EngelkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. ESTATE OF SUSTACHE v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Pachucki v. Republic Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marshall Schinner v. Michael GundrumWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Phillips v. ParmeleeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
  3. Marshall Schinner v. Michael GundrumWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Marshall Schinner v. Michael GundrumWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API