Legal Opinion

Trotman v. Hoberman

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1968PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Postel, J.

This is a proceeding to review a determination of the New York City Civil Service Commission.

Petitioner was dismissed from his position with the New York City Transit Authority after a disciplinary hearing. Petitioner appealed to the Civil Service Commission pursuant to section 76 of the Civil Service Law. The commission made the following determination: ‘ ‘ After reviewing all the evidence and the testimony in the case, the City Civil Service Commission found *916the penalty of dismissal to be harsh and voted to have the period from your dismissal which was effective as of May 15, 1967 to the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Julian C. Taylor v. New York City Transit Authority and Civil Service Commission of the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  2. Reed v. New York State Department of Social ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Antinore v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Rothstein v. Civil Service CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API