Huntsman v. Hendricks
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Eamsey county, Kelly, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after trial by the court, and judgment of $100 ordered for plaintiff, the amount claimed in the complaint being $1,000.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
Action on the covenants contained in a deed conveying lots in block 6 of Hitchcock’s addition to West St. Paul, brought by the grantee against the grantor, the former claiming that the latter had at the date of the deed no title to a portion of the lots. In the court below, apparently by consent of parties, the question of plaintiff’s right to recover at all was tried and determined by. the court without a jury, leaving, the question of the amount of damages to be determined upon another or -further trial. Having determined that plaintiff was entitled to recover, the question of the amount of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Boorman v. SunnuchsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Clute v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Ridgway v. LudlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Kimball v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Staley v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Hovelsrud v. HovelsrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911