Legal Opinion

Carson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1975No. 51477PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Webb, Judge.

1. In this burglary case error is enumerated upon improper remarks of the district attorney during closing *573argument, which was not reported, and upon the trial court’s refusal to allow the argument to be reported at defendant’s expense. This enumeration is meritorious and requires reversal. Code Ann. § 6-805 (j); Dumas v. State, 131 Ga. App. 79, 82 (6) (205 SE2d 119).

Argued November 3, 1975 Decided November 14, 1975. William Kenneth Carson, pro se,Douglas W. McDonald, for appellant. Nat Hancock, District Attorney, for appellee.

2. There appears to be some merit in the complaint…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dumas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Newell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API