Legal Opinion

Rakowsky v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided November 28, 1951No. Docket No. 29509Published

Petitioner acquired in 1941, ownership of a contract for patent royalties and agreed to pay for such rights and for other property acquired at the same time, $ 50,000 to American Cyanamid Company. Petitioner executed his promissory note for this $ 50,000 payable to Cyanamid and due October 15, 1947. On May 1, 1942, petitioner assigned to Cyanamid his royalty contract as security for the $ 50,000 which he owed Cyanamid.

Read the full summary

Petitioner acquired in 1941, ownership of a contract for patent royalties and agreed to pay for such rights and for other property acquired at the same time, $ 50,000 to American Cyanamid Company. Petitioner executed his promissory note for this $ 50,000 payable to Cyanamid and due October 15, 1947. On May 1, 1942, petitioner assigned to Cyanamid his royalty contract as security for the $ 50,000 which he owed Cyanamid. On January 10, 1944, petitioner assigned to his daughter, Janis Velie, all of his right, title and interest in the patent royalty contract which he owned, subject, however, to…

1Opinion of the Court

Victor Rakowsky and Ella J. Rakowsky, Husband and Wife, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Rakowsky v. Commissioner

Docket No. 29509

United States Tax Court

17 T.C. 876; 1951 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 29;

November 28, 1951, Promulgated

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Petitioner acquired in 1941, ownership of a contract for patent royalties and agreed to pay for such rights and for other property acquired at the same time, $ 50,000 to American Cyanamid Company. Petitioner executed his promissory note for this $ 50,000 payable to Cyanamid and due October 15, 1947. On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  2. Rakowsky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API