Legal Opinion
Breitman Iron Works, Inc. v. T. L. Rubsamen & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover for *633goods and materials sold and delivered, in which, inter alia, defendant T. L. Rubsamen & Co., Inc., cross-claimed against defendant Stork to recover damages for breach of contract, Stork appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 9, 1976, which denied his motion to vacate a stipulation of settlement which was entered into on the record in open court. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Special Term correctly concluded that appellant failed to set forth any grounds sufficient to warrant vacating the stipulation of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rado v. RadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Ragen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Wilson v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Elyachar v. ElyacharAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- D & E Development Corp. v. Parkchester Clothes Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heimuller v. Amoco Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Term Industries, Inc. v. Essbee Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Breitman Iron Works, Inc. v. T. L. Rubsamen & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977