Legal Opinion · Dissent

Banks v. Miller

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1972No. Nos. 12973, 12991, 12986Published

1DissentCrockett, Justice

I do not join with my colleagues of the majority in adhering to what impresses me as unnecessarily strict and literal interpretation of the statutes. Perhaps partly out of my desire as to what the law ought to be, and partly out of my view as to the general purpose of our statutes on judicial reform, I would prefer to take the view adopted by the plaintiffs and their advocates : that inasmuch as there was a *293known vacancy in the district judgeship, and that the vacancy was known to exist before the filing time (during the month of June 1972) and thus long before the next general election…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Norville v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API