Legal Opinion

Darling v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 11, 1990No. Nos. 88-2873, 88-2874PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

In this case we revisit section 12202 of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986 (“COBRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1383c(b) (1988), which we first interpreted in Darling v. Bowen, 878 F.2d 1069 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1782, 108 L.Ed.2d 783 (1990) 1. Section 12202 is a remedial statute enacted for the purpose of alleviating the adverse consequences that certain increases in social security benefits increases had for disabled widow(er)s seeking Medicaid. In 1984, when federal legislation to increase the social security…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Darling v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 31 soc.sec.rep.ser. 106, Medicare&medicaid Gu 38,828 Marietta Darling on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated and Gray Panthers Advocacy Committee v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services Health Care Financing Administration, Michael Reagen, Director of the Department of Social Services of the State of Missouri. Marietta Darling on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated and Gray Panthers Advocacy Committee v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services Health Care Financing Administration Michael Reagen, Director of the Department of Social Services of the State of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API