Legal Opinion
Hyatt v. Bonham
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 4, 1898No. 2,360PublishedCited by 5 opinions
■From the Daviess Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
— The appellees recovered the allowance of their claim against the decedent’s estate of which the appellant is the administratrix. The statement of the claim filed by the appellees was as follows:
“Statement of account. Washington, Ind., -, 1896. Est. of Hiram Hyatt. In account with M. L. Bonham & Sons. 1892. Nov. 11. To balance on Opera House Chairs, $118.04.”
*257Following this was the affidavit of Clif. O. Bonham, who swore that the above account “in favor of M. L. Bonham & Sons is correct; that no payments have been made thereon except the credits thereon given; that there are no set-offs…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Crosby v. JerolomanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- McDill v. GunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Taggart v. TevannyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Wolke v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Davis v. CallowayIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hamilton v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Chariton National Bank v. WhicherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Miller v. State ex rel. PratherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Southern Railway Co. v. HazlewoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Estate of Le Clerc, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1887