Legal Opinion
Ring v. Schilkoffsky
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 30, 1925No. 25619PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
On July 31, 1912, John B. Ring and Mary Helen Halsey, his wife, appeared before Jules F. Meunier, late notary public, and acknowledged that they were indebted to Joseph Schilkoffsky in the sum of $700, “borrowed money which the said Jos. Schilkoffsky has this day loaned and advanced to them,” for the reimbursement whereof they furnished their joint and several (i. e., solidary) promissory note payable in one year.
And to secure the payment of said note they then and there mortgaged in favor of said Jos. Schilkoffsky two certain lots of ground which the parties declared to be “the same property…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- T. B. Jordan & Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
- Knoblock & Rainold v. PoseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Abbott v. PrattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Birch v. BatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1870
- Carrere v. AucoinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Reed v. MeauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Allen v. Commercial National Bank in ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
- Consolidation Loans, Inc. v. GuercioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Rosenthal-Brown Fur Co. v. Jones-Frere Fur Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Bywater v. EnderleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.