Legal Opinion

Marta v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 22, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice:

The determinative question in this zoning case is whether the controlling section of the Newark Zoning Ordinance [Section 501(d)] 1 contains sufficient standards and guidelines to constitute a lawful delegation of legislative power and to afford due process. We think not.

I

The appellant, Albert H. Marta, applied for a permit to construct garden-type apartment buildings in a Residential “RD” District in the City of Newark. Under Section 501(d) of the Newark Zoning Ordinance, apartments are a permitted use in such District “when authorized by the Board of Adjustment after…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Chartiers Valley Joint Schools v. Allegheny County Board of School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Saveland Park Holding Corp. v. WielandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Norate Corp. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Town of Westford v. KilburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  2. M v. MSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  3. Husband M v. Wife MSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  5. Hornstein v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API