Legal Opinion
TAC Associates v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 15, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Long
The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) rejected an application for an Innocent Party Grant (IPG), a remedy under the Brownfield and Contaminated Site Remediation Act (BCSRA or “the Act”) intended to help certain owners of contaminated property defray the cost of remediation. N.J.S.A. 58:10B-5(d). The rejection was based on the fact that the applicant no longer owned the property and “[pjursuant to the N.J.S.A. 58:10B, the IPG only applies to a property owner who meets the eligibility criteria.” The applicant appealed and the Appellate Division reversed and remanded. TAC Assocs. v.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Service Armament Co. v. HylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Richardson v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- GE Solid State, Inc v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- State, Tp. of Pennsauken v. SchadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tac Assoc. v. Dept. of Env. Prot.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- HARTZ MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES, INC. VS, NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXPOSITION AUTHORITY (NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXPOSITION AUTHORITY)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020