Legal Opinion · Dissent

Zuicarelli v. Clark

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 12, 2003No. 2020851Published

1Dissent

The appellees, State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company ("State Farm") and Ophelia Clark, argue that Tina Zuicarelli's counterclaim against them is an action arising out of the alleged wrongful issuance of process, and, regardless of how couched, it is in actuality a claim for malicious prosecution. I agree, and am concerned that the effect of the reversal of the trial court's summary judgment as to this issue is to allow Zuicarelli to substitute the less stringent elements of a claim for negligence for those that our law prescribes with respect to conduct such as that herein at issue.

State…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cutts v. American United Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Montgomery v. City of MontgomeryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Kmart, Inc. v. AsaroCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API