Legal Opinion

Hugus & Hacke v. Dithridge Glass Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Court of Common Pleas, No. 1, of Allegheny county: Of October and November Term 1880, No. 228. Attachment execution issued by Hugus & Hacke against William Ihmsen and James E. Ledlie, and Elizabeth McLaughlin, wife of William F. McLaughlin, formerly Elizabeth Ihmsen, executors of Charles T. Ihmsen, deceased, partners as C. Ihmsen & Sons.

Read the full summary

Error to the Court of Common Pleas, No. 1, of Allegheny county: Of October and November Term 1880, No. 228. Attachment execution issued by Hugus & Hacke against William Ihmsen and James E. Ledlie, and Elizabeth McLaughlin, wife of William F. McLaughlin, formerly Elizabeth Ihmsen, executors of Charles T. Ihmsen, deceased, partners as C. Ihmsen & Sons. This was an attachment execution issued on a judgment for $502.81, and was recovered on the 10th of August 1875, upon a note of which the following is a copy: “$499j2A Pittsburgh, Pa., May 21, 1875. Sixty days after date, we promise to pay to the…

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered, November 22d 1880,

2Per curiam

This judgment is affirmed upon the opinion of the court below on the question of law reserved.

Judgment affirmed.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baker v. Singer Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Shryock v. BuckmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API