Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Lakewood v. Waselenchuk

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1994No. 64426Published

1Dissent

I respectfully dissent from the majority's decision to reverse appellant's conviction and remand the cause for a new trial. After a thorough view of the record before this court, I believe the trial court did not err in finding that appellant's right to counsel pursuant to R.C. 2935.20 was not violated. Moreover, I do not believe that violation of a statutory right to counsel, if found (and I do not believe the evidence supports such a finding), will result in a due process violation requiring the suppression of the results of a breathalyzer test.

Initially, I must take issue with the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API