City of Lakewood v. Waselenchuk
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Dissent
I respectfully dissent from the majority's decision to reverse appellant's conviction and remand the cause for a new trial. After a thorough view of the record before this court, I believe the trial court did not err in finding that appellant's right to counsel pursuant to R.C. 2935.20 was not violated. Moreover, I do not believe that violation of a statutory right to counsel, if found (and I do not believe the evidence supports such a finding), will result in a due process violation requiring the suppression of the results of a breathalyzer test.
Initially, I must take issue with the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.