Legal Opinion

Outcelt v. Golyansky

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 28, 1996No. 96SA78PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vollack

The petitioner, John S. Outcelt, a registered voter of the State of Colorado, challenges the title, ballot title and submission clause, summary, and fiscal impact statement prepared by the Title Setting Board (the Title Board) for a proposed constitutional amendment concerning parental choice in education.1 The respondents in this case are Gregory Golyansky and Pamela Mann, the proponents of the initiative (the Proponents), and Carole Pool, Rebecca Lennahan, and Richard Westfall, of the Title Board.2 The Title Board accepted the initiative submitted by the Proponents, including the title,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause, & Summary With Regard to a Proposed Petition for an Amendment to the Constitution of the State of Colorado Adding Paragraph (D) Subsection (8) of Section 20 of Article XSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. In re the Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause, & Summary Pertaining to the Campaign & Political Finance Initiative Adopted on February 12, 1992Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Matter of Title, Ballot Title 1997-98 No. 30Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Jones v. PolhillSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Outcelt v. BruceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. Matter of Title, Ballot Title, Etc., No. 64Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. Howes v. HayesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API