Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 11, 1884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Shelby Distmot Gowrf. Action or replevin. The cause was tried to a jury. After the evidence for plaintiffs was submitted, tlie court, upon motion of defendants, directed the jury to return a verdict for them. Plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

*399 1. SAMS: induced by fraud of vendse: delivery :resale by vendee: recovery of goods.

*398I. The petition shows that plaintiffs sold the *399oods involved in this suit to defendant, Anderson, upon false and fraudulent representations that his name was Swede, and that he was a merchant doing business in that name; that the goods were shipped to Swede as the consignee; and that he obtained possession thereof through false and fraudulent representations: The other defendants and intervenors in the case set up purchase of the goods from Anderson in good faith, and without notice of the frauds charged by…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Phelps v. . McQuadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Jaffrey v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1886
  3. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO. v. FlandersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Baehr v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  5. White v. PikeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API