Legal Opinion

Finley v. Williams

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 1815PublishedCited by 23 opinions

‘ THIS was an appeal from the decree of the Cireuit Court for the district of Kentucky, in a suit in .chancery, brought by Finley to compel Williams and vvho liaii t!l? elder patent, to cirnvey pertain lands to the Complainant whiph he .claimed by virtue of a >ior settlement, The cause was argued by Pope, for the Appellants, m^d Ciay, for the Apjiellecs, on the of' February, .1813, in the absence of the reporter.

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Ch. J.

delivered .the opinion of the Court as follows:

This cause depends on the lalul law of Virginia, whicb is .also the land law of Kentucky, that state having formed a part of Virginia when the act was passed in which the titles of both Plaintiff and Delendant originated. Both parties claim the land in controversy by virtue of improvements made previous to •the first day of'January, 1778, which improvements were recognized by the act generally termed “ the previous title law,” and gave the persons malting them pre-emption of one thousand acres of land, to include the improvement,…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Nathan E. Hooper, Louisa J. Hooper, and Amanda E. Hooper, Minors, by Absalom Fowler, Their Next Friend, in Error v. Jacob ScheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. State Ex Rel. Peterson v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Sagrera v. MoutonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Patin v. BlaizeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API