Legal Opinion

Eszlinger v. Wetzel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1982No. Civ. 10142PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

This is an appeal by Sam and Esther Eszlinger from an amended judgment that allowed Walwin and Christine Wetzel to rescind a contract for deed and to recover their down payment, and denial of a motion for new trial. The judgment and the order denying the motion for new trial are affirmed.

A 10-acre tract of land located less than one-half mile north of the city limits of Ashley, owned by the Eszlingers, was offered for sale at a public auction on October 16,1979. The auction bill contained, among other statements, the following:

“This property is located very good for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Waletzko v. HerdegenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hoge v. HogeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Ellendale Farmers Union Cooperative Ass'n v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Matton Oil Transfer Corporation v. DynamicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tom Beuchler Construction, Inc. v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. LillehaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Landsberger v. LandsbergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Radspinner v. CharlesworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Smith v. WatsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API