State, Ex Rel. Lane v. Bass
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
LUMPKIN, J.;:
Concur in Part/Dissent in Part.
¶ 1 I concur in the Court's decision to grant the Writ of Prohibition in this case. However, I must dissent to the Court creating a procedure that not only further delays a trial on the merits in a capital murder case, but is totally unnecessary.
¶ 2 While I recognize the Court is vested with the authority to create procedures of this type, I believe the first question to ask is whether the procedure is necessary. This Court has already developed a procedure through its decisions in Murphy v. State, 2002 OK CR 32, 54 P.3d 556; Lambert v. State, 2003…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- Lambert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Hardin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
- Sy Chong Nguyen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.