Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Hare

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 12, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

opinion of the court

C. Raymond Radigan, J.

The motion to dismiss this discovery proceeding presents the somewhat novel question of whether one executor can commence a proceeding to recover assets in the possession of a coexecutor. My predecessor, Surrogate Bennett, declined to entertain such a proceeding in Matter of Matheron (207 Misc 1061), primarily because of the common-law theory treating coexecutors as one and the inability to conceptualize an entity suing itself in actions at law, but apparently allowing it in equitable actions. For this reason, the court concluded that it should…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. In re the Estate of MatheronNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API