Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Zatuchni v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 12, 2008No. 2007-5034Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDyk, Circuit Judge

This case presents a simple question: whether a claim for compensation for a vaccine-related injury under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (the “Vaccine Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10, to -34 (2000), survives the death of a petitioner. Without any basis in the statutory text, the majority holds that the Vaccine Act provides for survivorship. In my view, the Vaccine Act is entirely silent as to issues of survivorship. The majority’s approach is contrary to established authority recognized explicitly in eight circuits, and implicitly by the Supreme Court, that surviv-orship is determined…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API