Legal Opinion · Dissent

Woodruff v. Cook

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 27, 1986No. 05-85-00516-CVPublished

1DissentAkin, Justice

I cannot agree that Annie received adequate notice of the matters to be determined and the relief to be sought at the second hearing on the motion for contempt and sanctions held on February 7, 1985. Thus, I would hold that Annie was denied due process of law. Accordingly, I must dissent.

The Estate filed its Motion for Contempt and Sanctions on January 4, 1985, and a hearing on the motion was originally set for January 28th. On January 28th, approximately 30 minutes before the time set for the hearing, Annie’s attorney arrived at the offices of the Estate’s attorney with some documents in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arndt v. FarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Interest of B-----M-----NCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Campbell v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Worman v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API