Legal Opinion

Beeler v. Young

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 8, 1814PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*520OPINION of the Court, by

Judge Owsley.

— This was an action of debt, brought in the court below by Young, on an assigned obligation executed by Beeler to Delany Washburn, and by him assigned to Young, Beeler pleaded he was an infant under the age of 21 vears when he executed the obligation. To this plea Young replied that Beeler at the time of executing the note was not an infant, and that he after he arrived to aSe 21 years confirmed the obligation and pro-mised to pay the same.

Beeler demurred to this replication, which being :0¡ne<j was overruled by the court, and on the motion of Beeler he…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Pierce's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Glenn v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
  3. Hawkins v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1845

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API