Legal Opinion

State v. Smith, 05 Ma 219 (6-21-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 2007No. 05 MA 219PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Jesse Smith, Jr. appeals from his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence, which was entered after a jury trial in County Court No. 5 in Canfield. On appeal, appellant alleges a lack of personal jurisdiction, prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel, improper admission of his refusal to take a chemical test, insufficient evidence of impairment and a coercive jury instruction on continuation of deliberations. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

{¶ 2} On June 29,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Keene, 08 Ma 95 (3-11-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. BruceOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. State v. NorthOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State v. BulinOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API