State v. Smith, 05 Ma 219 (6-21-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Jesse Smith, Jr. appeals from his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence, which was entered after a jury trial in County Court No. 5 in Canfield. On appeal, appellant alleges a lack of personal jurisdiction, prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel, improper admission of his refusal to take a chemical test, insufficient evidence of impairment and a coercive jury instruction on continuation of deliberations. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
{¶ 2} On June 29,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Keene, 08 Ma 95 (3-11-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. BruceOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. NorthOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. BulinOhio Court of Appeals · 2011