Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Real Estate Financing, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 4, 1991No. 1901816PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

Because we find that neither the complaint nor the record demonstrates the existence of any material fact over which there is a genuine dispute that would necessitate resolution by a jury, we affirm the summary judgment, on the authority of Rule 56, A.R.Civ.P. That rule sets forth a two-tiered standard for determining whether to enter a summary judgment. In order to enter a summary judgment, the trial court must determine: 1) that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and 2) that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. In determining whether a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bean v. CraigSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Ryan v. Charles Townsend Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Turner v. Systems Fuel, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Holman v. McMullan TruckingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Williams v. M. Kimerling & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API