Legal Opinion
Rowe v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 13, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarpinello, J.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
When petitioner’s urine sample twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids, he was charged with violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits drug use. At a tier III hearing on the charge, petitioner claimed that the medications he was taking caused false positive test results. The Hearing Officer called a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bradstreet v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Harris v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Donato v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- Terrence v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Madison v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Lorino v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Vega v. BezioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Vega v. BezioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013