State v. Seiber
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
We have reviewed appellant’s twenty-one propositions of law, independently assessed the evidence relating to the death sentence, balanced the aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors, and reviewed the proportionality of the sentence to those imposed in similar cases. As a result, we affirm the convictions and sentence of death.
I
Appropriateness of Death Penalty
In his initial proposition of law, appellant argues that the death penalty is not appropriate in his case. Appellant asserts that we should conclude, after independently assessing the case under R.C. 2929.05, that the…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by193 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.