Legal Opinion
Ranschburg v. Toan
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 8, 1983No. 82-1847PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENNETT, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court,1 540 F.Supp. 745 (W.D.Mo. 1982), granting a permanent injunction against the Missouri State Director of the Department of Social Services and the Director of the Division of Family Services from denying Utilicare benefits, Mo.Ann. Stat. §§ 660.100-.135 (Vernon Supp.1983), to plaintiff-appellee and others similarly situated. The basis for granting the injunction was that the Missouri Utilicare statute violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the order of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States Department of Agriculture v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Delaware River Basin Commission v. Bucks County Water & Sewer AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Medora v. ColauttiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Barone v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Oklahoma Ass'n for Equitable Taxation v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Barone v. D. of Human Serv., Div. of Med. Asst.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Teresa Baker, Etc. v. City of ConcordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Conklin v. ShinpochWashington Supreme Court · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.