Legal Opinion
People v. Gadberry
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 20, 2019No. 18SA208, PeoplePublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE HOOD delivered the Opinion of the Court.
*451¶1 Marijuana isn't meth. But drug-detection dog Talu can't tell the difference. So when Talu alerted to the driver and passenger side doors of Amanda Gadberry's truck, the officers didn't know whether Talu had found marijuana, which is legal in some circumstances in Colorado, or meth, which never is. This quandary led us in People v. McKnight , a companion case also announced today, to hold that persons twenty-one years of age or older have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the possession of one ounce or less of marijuana in Colorado,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- People v. ZunigaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. GadberrySupreme Court of Colorado · 2019